Not to parallel the plot but only the lede or ship* of crime and punishment, just how can wars be prosecuted if we don't appreciate the lede or ship.**
Not to be facitious or overly optimistic, but maybe a call for complete amnesty is in order. I know it is pi in the sky, but considering the alternatives and the GOP.
Goal of Progress ?
* read it or... [mo'moss?]
(let alone gold 'n mean?)
**It may have been nice to order the inserts, but 2L8.
FORMER HOME OF BEATINGAROUNDTHEBUSH.ORG >> HOME OF Political_Progress_For_People.blogspot.com >> >> >> Political Prodding and Probing People for Progress << << << >>> [[ For those NOT...BeatingAroundTheBush See links.]] <<< [[ EMAIL: LeRoy-Rogers at comcast net ]]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query amnesty. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query amnesty. Sort by date Show all posts
Wednesday, June 03, 2015
Thursday, January 15, 2009
Amnesty for Cowboys and Bulls
Might me most chastened yet.*
But for the satire or obtuse impaired:
I suggest amnesty for war criminals and terrorists, and journalists and pundits.
The one catch? Truth and Reconciliation... anyone?
No more death penalty or Oilygarchy, only a last resort.
* I am uncertain todate, but not of the spelling here.
But for the satire or obtuse impaired:
I suggest amnesty for war criminals and terrorists, and journalists and pundits.
The one catch? Truth and Reconciliation... anyone?
No more death penalty or Oilygarchy, only a last resort.
* I am uncertain todate, but not of the spelling here.
Saturday, October 31, 2009
D'over Again
The Ed Show s The Nation over the world.
[In Surge we trust. How's about amnesty? (For previous terrorists and previous administrations.) Going forward..."with liberty and justice for all."]
[Never more option. ]
[In Surge we trust. How's about amnesty? (For previous terrorists and previous administrations.) Going forward..."with liberty and justice for all."]
[Never more option. ]
Friday, July 09, 2010
Immigration Reform
and Political Maneuvering:
[Posted* elsewhere under construction.]
* I had an earlier comment [found it: SEE (scroll to)"To Heck with the Political..." 2010-07-08 12:04] not at the above elsewhere link
[My point is that Republicans are too often for something before they are against it. Some people believe there are absolutes, and do not see the gray** in their words. Present company included. Then there are people that follow leaders or misleaders. In regards to Immigration Reform, Ronald Reagan was not so demonized for his amnesty for illegal or undocumented workers. And Senator McCain was for comprehensive reform before he was against it. But the big issue is who is responsible and that is the federal government.[***] There is an optional federal E-verify program, and there are two AZ laws that are at issue. The problem is Republicans making it an issue for state political calculations, and not addressing it at the federal level for the federal political calculations.]
** or is it purple or constitutional/political separations
[*** post post links added]
[The current policy is that hiring of undocumented workers is the crime without punishment. Comprehensive Immigration Reform would be documentation with punishment but at least a process. My theory is that you cannot just enforce laws at will without interpretation and implimentation consideration, unless you are Republican. The Federal Goverment is not just the Obama Administration, it is also congress. Congress is not just the House but also the Senate. While the House is solidly in Democratic control, the Senate is in minority control, Republican 41, even though there is a bi-partisan majority. 56-D/2-I]
[Mini-Meta- Meme? I just mean a heckuva job filtering, when there is so much out there. Keep in mind: A. what a job it would be to check MSNBC & FOX and B. the fact that Politifact began only during the 2008 campaign.]
[Posted* elsewhere under construction.]
* I had an earlier comment [found it: SEE (scroll to)"To Heck with the Political..." 2010-07-08 12:04] not at the above elsewhere link
[My point is that Republicans are too often for something before they are against it. Some people believe there are absolutes, and do not see the gray** in their words. Present company included. Then there are people that follow leaders or misleaders. In regards to Immigration Reform, Ronald Reagan was not so demonized for his amnesty for illegal or undocumented workers. And Senator McCain was for comprehensive reform before he was against it. But the big issue is who is responsible and that is the federal government.[***] There is an optional federal E-verify program, and there are two AZ laws that are at issue. The problem is Republicans making it an issue for state political calculations, and not addressing it at the federal level for the federal political calculations.]
** or is it purple or constitutional/political separations
[*** post post links added]
[The current policy is that hiring of undocumented workers is the crime without punishment. Comprehensive Immigration Reform would be documentation with punishment but at least a process. My theory is that you cannot just enforce laws at will without interpretation and implimentation consideration, unless you are Republican. The Federal Goverment is not just the Obama Administration, it is also congress. Congress is not just the House but also the Senate. While the House is solidly in Democratic control, the Senate is in minority control, Republican 41, even though there is a bi-partisan majority. 56-D/2-I]
[Mini-Meta- Meme? I just mean a heckuva job filtering, when there is so much out there. Keep in mind: A. what a job it would be to check MSNBC & FOX and B. the fact that Politifact began only during the 2008 campaign.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)